Hey, Pastor John!
As I was reading in John tonight, I came across this and wanted to ask you about it! In John 16 while Jesus is talking about the Comforter coming, he refers to the Comforter as a “he” instead of an “it.”
John 16
- But I tell you the truth; it’s better for you that I go away, for if I don’t go away, the Comforter won’t come to you. But if I go, I’ll send him to you.
- And when he comes, he’ll convict the world of sin, and of righteousness, and of judgment:
After reading that and trying to understand why Jesus may have said it that way, it reminded me of the set of videos you made several years back describing how the Greek text makes it very clear that the Spirit is a thing instead of a person. I know the Spirit isn’t a person, but do you know why Jesus may have said that? The only thing I could think of was maybe Jesus used “he” because he was using “comforter” as a more personal name? Or maybe because “comforter” is masculine in Greek? At the end of the day I know it’s a very small thing, but I enjoyed considering it and wanted to see if you know why Jesus said it that way!
Thank you!
Samuel
Here are the videos on the Spirit study!
Pt. 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BI2h1eQvjdc
Pt. 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrwoWDE3t70&t=101s
Pt. 3: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=euXj90FYycU
=========
Hi Samuel.
I dealt with that issue on Page 25 of The Influence of Trinitarian Doctrine on Translations of the Bible. You can find the entire study at GoingtoJesus.com. Here is that section:
John 16:7–14
- Nevertheless, I am telling you the truth; it is better for you that I go away. For if I do not go away, the Comforter will not come to you; but if I go, I will send him to you.
- And when he [“that(masculine)one”] comes, he will reprove the world for sin, for righteousness, and for judgment;
- for sin because they do not believe in me,
- and for righteousness because I am going to the Father and you no longer see me,
- and for judgment because the ruler of this world has been judged.”
¶ 12. “I still have much to tell you, but you are not now able to bear it.
13. When he [“that (masculine) one”], the Spirit of truth, comes, he will guide you into all truth. For he will not speak of himself, but whatever he will hear, he will speak, and he will reveal to you things that are coming.
14. He will glorify me because he will take from what is mine and reveal it to you.
John 16:13 at first appears to contain a masculine pronoun referring to the Spirit, but pneuma is not the subject here. The subject throughout this section is paraclatos, beginning with verse 7.
The powerful influence of the Trinitarian faith upon even a great scholar’s mind is evident in Professor A. T. Robertson’s treatment of John 16:13. He dismisses the possibility of “that (masculine) one” in verse 13 referring to paraclatos because of the five verses that come between paraclatos and that pronoun. And he makes that assertion, despite the fact that verses 8–11 make up just one long sentence, and (2) “that (masculine) one” in verse 8 is the only subject of that long sentence. In other words, paraclatos is the only subject of verses 7–11. Why then, could it not be the subject of verse 13 as well? To say, as Dr. Robertson does (p. 709), “in this passage John is insisting on the personality of the Holy Spirit” is a completely unwarranted assessment of the grammar and imposes upon John a Trinitarian faith about which he in no other place says anything, though opportunities abounded for him to do so. No one except someone predisposed to a Trinitarian faith would possibly see in John’s grammar in these verses a voice “insisting” on the personhood of God’s spirit.
One should especially note that the use of the masculine noun, paraclatos, cannot be taken as evidence that the Spirit is a (masculine) personality, for other such descriptive titles for the Spirit are feminine words, such as dove, promise, and gift.
In fact, the word most closely related to paraclatos is paraclasis (consolation), and it is feminine. In Scripture, there are many more feminine words than masculine words used in reference to the Spirit. But who is willing to suggest that the Spirit should be referred to as she?
Outside of these verses in John, the only other usage of paraclatos is in reference to Jesus himself, found in 1John 2:1.
Thank you for the question, Samuel. I hope this helps.
Pastor John